I READ YOUR MOST RECENT POST; SUBJECT: THE PRAGMATISM OF
COMPROMISE.
IT ALL SOUNDS VERY REASONABLE, SO EASY; BUT I RESPECTFULLY
DISAGREE.... COMPROMISING YOUR PRINCIPLES IS A LOSING
PROPOSITIONN FOR SURE.
THE BIBLE TELLS TRUE CHRISTIANS TO STAND ON "HIS" PRINCIPLES
NO MATTER WHO OR WHAT TILL THE END. (EVEN DEATH)
HOW CAN I COMPROMISE WITH THE PRO CHOICE CROWD AND HAVE
A CLEAR CONSCIENCE??
HOW CAN I COMPROMISE ON ISSUE AFTER ISSUE JUST TO WIN ELECTIONS?
WHAT PRINCIPLES WILL I HAVE LEFT TO LIVE BY OR FOR????
HOW MANY ISSUES HAVE THE LIBERALS COMPROMISED ON???
IF I AM A VIRGIN AND I LET A MAN FONDLE MY BREASTS, THEN MY
THIGH, THEN MY BUTTOCKS, PRETTY SOON HE'S GOING TO STRIKE OIL....
AND IF I SAY NO, HE'LL SAY; "WHY NOT, YOU LET ME TOUCH EVERYTHING
ELSE??"....OR BY THAT TIME I WON'T WANT HIM TO STOP.....
COMPROMISE IS A SLOW DEATH. LOOK AT WHO YOU WANT TO COMPROMISE
WITH....RINO'S WANT TO LEGALIZE 10'S OF MILLIONS OF ILLEGALS CAUSE
THEY THINK THAT THEY WILL VOTE REPUBLICAN. IF SOMEBODY BROKE
INTO YOUR HOUSE WOULD YOU MAKE THEM A MEMBER OF THE FAMILY??
WHY BOTHER HAVING LAWS OR BORDERS THEN??
RINO'S WANT TO LEGALIZE GAY MARRIAGE,, WHAT DOES GOD SAY ABOUT
THAT?? RINO'S WANT TO LEGALIZE POT,, WHY NOT LEGALIZE ALL DRUGS
THEN??
YOU'RE GIVING UP THE FIGHT ISSUE BY ISSUE ANYWAY....BESIDES, I'VE
BEEN THERE AND DONE THAT WITH BUSH, MC CAIN AND ROMNEY.
I LOVED PRESIDENT BUSH FOR HIS STAND ON THE WAR, ABORTION AND
EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH; BUT HE WAS TOO LIBERAL ON SPENDING.
I SIMPLY DID NOT LIKE MC CAIN BECAUSE HE'S A TWO FACED, BACKSTABING
DOG WHO SIDED WITH THE DEMOCRATS MORE THAN HIS PRESIDENT....
MR ROMNEY IS A FINE AND DECENT MAN BUT HE IS TOO LIBERAL, TOO
WILLING TO COMPROMISE JUST TO GET ALONG....AND SO I SWALLOWED
HARD AND VOTED FOR THOSE TWO ANYWAY BECAUSE I DISLIKED OBAMA
MORE; BUT I FEEL THAT IF EITHER ONE HAD GOT ELECTED, HE WOULD HAVE
PUSHED THE LIBERAL AGENDA MORE THAN FIGHT FOR THE CONSERVATIVE
CAUSE....I WOULD HAVE LOVED IT IF PRESIDENT BUSH HAD BANNED
ABORTION (ON DEMAND) BY EXECUTIVE ORDER EVEN IF IT COST HIM
RE-ELECTION..........SO DR CARSON,, AT THIS POINT I'M DONE BEING
PRAGMATIC, I'M DONE COMPROMISING MY PRINCIPLES,, I WANT THE
LIBERALS TO COMPROMISE; AND AS LONG AS WE COMPROMISE, THEY WON'T
HAVE TO.....
IF CONSERVATIVES HAVE TO LOSE 4,5 OR 6 ELECTIONS, THEN SO BE IT....
PRINCIPLES ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN WINNING ELECTIONS
WHEN THINGS GET BAD ENOUGH, THE PEOPLE WILL BEG FOR CONSERVATIVE
LEADERSHIP, THEY WILL VOTE THE RIGHT WAY....
FINALLY DR CARSON, YOU USED THE EXAMPLE OF ABORTION TO PULL AT
MY HEART STRINGS; BUT IF THE LIBERALS KEEP PERFORMING ABORTIONS
THEN THE BLOOD IS ON THEIR HANDS NOT MINE.....YOU'RE ASKING ME TO
COMPROMISE MY PRINCIPLES TO SAVE THE LIVES OF UNBORN BABIES.....
IS THAT FAIR?? WITHOUT GODLY PRINCIPLES WHAT IS LIFE WORTH ANYWAY??
BOTTOM LINE: SIR, YOU VOTE YOUR WAY AND I'LL VOTE MINE......
RONALD J LAMB
COMPROMISE.
IT ALL SOUNDS VERY REASONABLE, SO EASY; BUT I RESPECTFULLY
DISAGREE.... COMPROMISING YOUR PRINCIPLES IS A LOSING
PROPOSITIONN FOR SURE.
THE BIBLE TELLS TRUE CHRISTIANS TO STAND ON "HIS" PRINCIPLES
NO MATTER WHO OR WHAT TILL THE END. (EVEN DEATH)
HOW CAN I COMPROMISE WITH THE PRO CHOICE CROWD AND HAVE
A CLEAR CONSCIENCE??
HOW CAN I COMPROMISE ON ISSUE AFTER ISSUE JUST TO WIN ELECTIONS?
WHAT PRINCIPLES WILL I HAVE LEFT TO LIVE BY OR FOR????
HOW MANY ISSUES HAVE THE LIBERALS COMPROMISED ON???
IF I AM A VIRGIN AND I LET A MAN FONDLE MY BREASTS, THEN MY
THIGH, THEN MY BUTTOCKS, PRETTY SOON HE'S GOING TO STRIKE OIL....
AND IF I SAY NO, HE'LL SAY; "WHY NOT, YOU LET ME TOUCH EVERYTHING
ELSE??"....OR BY THAT TIME I WON'T WANT HIM TO STOP.....
COMPROMISE IS A SLOW DEATH. LOOK AT WHO YOU WANT TO COMPROMISE
WITH....RINO'S WANT TO LEGALIZE 10'S OF MILLIONS OF ILLEGALS CAUSE
THEY THINK THAT THEY WILL VOTE REPUBLICAN. IF SOMEBODY BROKE
INTO YOUR HOUSE WOULD YOU MAKE THEM A MEMBER OF THE FAMILY??
WHY BOTHER HAVING LAWS OR BORDERS THEN??
RINO'S WANT TO LEGALIZE GAY MARRIAGE,, WHAT DOES GOD SAY ABOUT
THAT?? RINO'S WANT TO LEGALIZE POT,, WHY NOT LEGALIZE ALL DRUGS
THEN??
YOU'RE GIVING UP THE FIGHT ISSUE BY ISSUE ANYWAY....BESIDES, I'VE
BEEN THERE AND DONE THAT WITH BUSH, MC CAIN AND ROMNEY.
I LOVED PRESIDENT BUSH FOR HIS STAND ON THE WAR, ABORTION AND
EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH; BUT HE WAS TOO LIBERAL ON SPENDING.
I SIMPLY DID NOT LIKE MC CAIN BECAUSE HE'S A TWO FACED, BACKSTABING
DOG WHO SIDED WITH THE DEMOCRATS MORE THAN HIS PRESIDENT....
MR ROMNEY IS A FINE AND DECENT MAN BUT HE IS TOO LIBERAL, TOO
WILLING TO COMPROMISE JUST TO GET ALONG....AND SO I SWALLOWED
HARD AND VOTED FOR THOSE TWO ANYWAY BECAUSE I DISLIKED OBAMA
MORE; BUT I FEEL THAT IF EITHER ONE HAD GOT ELECTED, HE WOULD HAVE
PUSHED THE LIBERAL AGENDA MORE THAN FIGHT FOR THE CONSERVATIVE
CAUSE....I WOULD HAVE LOVED IT IF PRESIDENT BUSH HAD BANNED
ABORTION (ON DEMAND) BY EXECUTIVE ORDER EVEN IF IT COST HIM
RE-ELECTION..........SO DR CARSON,, AT THIS POINT I'M DONE BEING
PRAGMATIC, I'M DONE COMPROMISING MY PRINCIPLES,, I WANT THE
LIBERALS TO COMPROMISE; AND AS LONG AS WE COMPROMISE, THEY WON'T
HAVE TO.....
IF CONSERVATIVES HAVE TO LOSE 4,5 OR 6 ELECTIONS, THEN SO BE IT....
PRINCIPLES ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN WINNING ELECTIONS
WHEN THINGS GET BAD ENOUGH, THE PEOPLE WILL BEG FOR CONSERVATIVE
LEADERSHIP, THEY WILL VOTE THE RIGHT WAY....
FINALLY DR CARSON, YOU USED THE EXAMPLE OF ABORTION TO PULL AT
MY HEART STRINGS; BUT IF THE LIBERALS KEEP PERFORMING ABORTIONS
THEN THE BLOOD IS ON THEIR HANDS NOT MINE.....YOU'RE ASKING ME TO
COMPROMISE MY PRINCIPLES TO SAVE THE LIVES OF UNBORN BABIES.....
IS THAT FAIR?? WITHOUT GODLY PRINCIPLES WHAT IS LIFE WORTH ANYWAY??
BOTTOM LINE: SIR, YOU VOTE YOUR WAY AND I'LL VOTE MINE......
RONALD J LAMB
Comments
Post a Comment