WITH THE RISE OF AL QUEDA SOME FIFTEEN YEARS AGO, IT IS EVIDENT THAT
ALL PRECAUTIONS SHOULD BE EXERCISED, THAT ALL MEASURES SHOULD
BE TAKEN TO PREVENT ANOTHER 911, TO PROTECT THE HOMELAND AS THEY
(POLITICIANS) KEEP PROMISING! IT TOOK THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION THREE
YEARS OF PARTISAN "COMBAT" (2004) AFTER 911 TO GET MONEY TO BUILD A
FENCE ON THE SOUTHERN BORDER. THEN, WHEN THE DEMOCRATS TOOK
OVER THE HOUSE AND SENATE IN 2007, THEY IMMEDIATLY CUT THE FUNDING
FOR THE FENCE, LEAVING IT HALF FINISHED.....WHY WOULD I TRUST THE
DEMOCRAT PARTY AFTER THAT??
AFTER THE U.S. TROOPS DEFEATED AL QUEDA IN IRAQ, IRAQ WAS VULNERABLE
TO "OUTSIDE" FORCES, THEN OBAMA, THE "PEACENIK" WITHDREW ALL THE
SECURITY FORCES FROM IRAQ....THANKS TO HIM, ISIS WAS BORN, RICHER,
MORE VISCIOUS, MORE POWERFUL THAN AL QUEDA.
THEIR "SPOKESMEN" HAVE VOWED TO ATTACK OUR CITIES, THEY HAVE VOWED
TO FLY THE BLACK FLAG OVER THE WHITE HOUSE.....SINCE THE TERRORISTS
MANAGED TO PULL OFF 911, I WOULD TAKE THEIR THREATS SERIOUSLY....
SINCE 2007, THE BORDER HAS BEEN WIDE OPEN. OBAMA HAS LET THOUSANDS
OF ILLEGALS CROSS THE BORDER AND HAS ESCORTED THEM TO CITIES
ACROSS THE U.S. WHY WOULD I TRUST THE DEMOCRAT PARTY OR OBAMA
TO PROTECT ME/US FROM ISIS??
IT IS NOT HARD TO CONCEIVE THE POSSIBILITY OF ISIS OPERATIVES COMING
ACROSS THE WIDE OPEN BORDER WITH TOO FEW MEN TO GUARD IT....OBAMA WANTS TO SEND 3,000 TROOPS TO AFRICA TO FIGHT THE EBOLA VIRUS, WHY NOT
PUT 3,000 TROOPS ON THE BORDER AS WELL?? YEAH, THAT'S A GREAT
COMPROMISE OBAMA....JUST TO BE ON THE SAFE SIDE, FOR YOUR OWN PEOPLE.
HERE ARE A FEW REASONS WHY THE BORDER IS STILL UNSECURED:
1- BUSINESSES WANT CHEAP LABOR.
2- THE UNIONS WANT TO INCREASE MEMBERSHIP.
3- THE DEMOCRAT PARTY WANTS MORE DEPENDANTS ON GOVERNMENT
BENE'S
4-SOME FOLKS JUST DON'T WANT BORDERS PERIOD....
RONALD J LAMB
ALL PRECAUTIONS SHOULD BE EXERCISED, THAT ALL MEASURES SHOULD
BE TAKEN TO PREVENT ANOTHER 911, TO PROTECT THE HOMELAND AS THEY
(POLITICIANS) KEEP PROMISING! IT TOOK THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION THREE
YEARS OF PARTISAN "COMBAT" (2004) AFTER 911 TO GET MONEY TO BUILD A
FENCE ON THE SOUTHERN BORDER. THEN, WHEN THE DEMOCRATS TOOK
OVER THE HOUSE AND SENATE IN 2007, THEY IMMEDIATLY CUT THE FUNDING
FOR THE FENCE, LEAVING IT HALF FINISHED.....WHY WOULD I TRUST THE
DEMOCRAT PARTY AFTER THAT??
AFTER THE U.S. TROOPS DEFEATED AL QUEDA IN IRAQ, IRAQ WAS VULNERABLE
TO "OUTSIDE" FORCES, THEN OBAMA, THE "PEACENIK" WITHDREW ALL THE
SECURITY FORCES FROM IRAQ....THANKS TO HIM, ISIS WAS BORN, RICHER,
MORE VISCIOUS, MORE POWERFUL THAN AL QUEDA.
THEIR "SPOKESMEN" HAVE VOWED TO ATTACK OUR CITIES, THEY HAVE VOWED
TO FLY THE BLACK FLAG OVER THE WHITE HOUSE.....SINCE THE TERRORISTS
MANAGED TO PULL OFF 911, I WOULD TAKE THEIR THREATS SERIOUSLY....
SINCE 2007, THE BORDER HAS BEEN WIDE OPEN. OBAMA HAS LET THOUSANDS
OF ILLEGALS CROSS THE BORDER AND HAS ESCORTED THEM TO CITIES
ACROSS THE U.S. WHY WOULD I TRUST THE DEMOCRAT PARTY OR OBAMA
TO PROTECT ME/US FROM ISIS??
IT IS NOT HARD TO CONCEIVE THE POSSIBILITY OF ISIS OPERATIVES COMING
ACROSS THE WIDE OPEN BORDER WITH TOO FEW MEN TO GUARD IT....OBAMA WANTS TO SEND 3,000 TROOPS TO AFRICA TO FIGHT THE EBOLA VIRUS, WHY NOT
PUT 3,000 TROOPS ON THE BORDER AS WELL?? YEAH, THAT'S A GREAT
COMPROMISE OBAMA....JUST TO BE ON THE SAFE SIDE, FOR YOUR OWN PEOPLE.
HERE ARE A FEW REASONS WHY THE BORDER IS STILL UNSECURED:
1- BUSINESSES WANT CHEAP LABOR.
2- THE UNIONS WANT TO INCREASE MEMBERSHIP.
3- THE DEMOCRAT PARTY WANTS MORE DEPENDANTS ON GOVERNMENT
BENE'S
4-SOME FOLKS JUST DON'T WANT BORDERS PERIOD....
RONALD J LAMB
Comments
Post a Comment